05302017Headline:

St. Cloud, Minnesota

HomeMinnesotaSt. Cloud

Email Mike Bryant Mike Bryant on LinkedIn Mike Bryant on Twitter Mike Bryant on Facebook Mike Bryant on Avvo
Mike Bryant
Mike Bryant
Attorney • (800) 770-7008

Crash Vs. Accident

2 comments

I found a very interesting discussion in an Ask the Trooper article from Hometownsource.com.    When I saw the headline,  I wasn’t sure what this was really going to be about.       For the type of work we do,  the distinction can play a role in how the jury sees fault/liability.   Sometimes they go with accident and that it really isn’t anyone’s fault or done on purpose.  The problem is that negligence isn’t about whether it was intentional or not.

The Sgt. Curt Mowers Trooper’s angle was helpful:

The spark for this issue stems from a court trial from more than a decade ago involving the intentional ramming of a police vehicle, which resulted in the death of a police officer.

During the trial, an attorney brought up the point that the incident was referred to by police in all of the reports as an “accident.” It also was reported by police on an “accident” report form, thus it was argued that the incident was not intentional and charges should be dismissed. I won’t get into the results of that trial, but ever since that time, traffic safety officials in the state have made a huge effort to influence everyone to use the word “crash” and not the word “accident.”

Personally, I have been on board with this since the beginning. Mostly, the initial efforts for change were aimed at officers, media, and traffic safety officials. We know that human driving error causes the vast majority of crashes and are therefore preventable. These crashes are not accidents and we need to use the correct term to define this.

Here the question was whether the action was a crime, so the findings of intent are important.   However, as he explains it,  a number of the issues and findings are related.

The answer also points out the different angles that defenses can take.   It is the reason why an experienced attorney can have an effect and why going it alone with the insurance company can get you or your loved ones in trouble.

 

If you, your family, or someone you know is in an accident, it is worth taking the time to sit down and talk to an experienced law firm with success in helping people who are injured through no fault of their own. The consultations are free and it allows you to figure out what rights you have after an injury

 

2 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

  1. up arrow

    I have felt this is the case many times, so it was good to read it from somewhere else! I have a similar issue arise when I ask if someone was hurt. Even though the person went to the hospital and had physical therapy, they say no I wasn’t hurt. Since they did not suffer broken bones or a need for surgery people do not think they were hurt. I change my question, did you seek out medical attention, and what for. They then say well my neck was hurting.

  2. Mike Bryant says:
    up arrow

    Very good point. Thanks for reading and the comment.