The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search feed instagram google-plus avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content
| Bradshaw & Bryant PLLC

I have seen a little bit about these lawsuits. I looked at it as basically people aren't getting what they paid for. If you buy a foot long sub, it should be a foot long. Just like if you bought a gallon of gas, a dozen eggs , or a 56 inch TV. They charged you an amount and you paid it. What would they do if you said, "OK, it's $5.00, how about I give you $4.00?"

Now there have been people who question the claim and attack it as a class action where people really won't be helped or that you should just get over it.

I found an interesting video on Youtube discussing the case:

http://youtu.be/3D-ePawa1Is

The lawyer involved has an interesting story at around the 9:30 mark that talks about emails he gets from people saying how crazy the case is. I wonder what they expect when they buy something? I can understand the argument that the market should just deal with it, but am bothered by the fraudulent advertising.

I also wonder why the bread isn't the correct size. Isn't it made in a mold? I will grant that there can be shrinkage, but sounds like people are finding consistent measurements of 11 inches and that the case isn't based on one bad batch. I also will be interested in the explanation from Subway on why they aren't providing a full product or at least somehow notifying the consumer that they aren't getting what they are paying for.

Comments for this article are closed, but you may still contact the author privately.